![divinity original sin 2 silence broken divinity original sin 2 silence broken](https://static0.gamerantimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Divinity-Original-Sin-2-Gloves-of-Teleportation-Unique-Armor.jpg)
![divinity original sin 2 silence broken divinity original sin 2 silence broken](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/m-3sZdW57rQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
![divinity original sin 2 silence broken divinity original sin 2 silence broken](https://oyster.ignimgs.com/mediawiki/apis.ign.com/divinity-original-sin-2/e/e0/Teleportgloves1.jpg)
I think that Dan’s shift in part 2 (around 16 minutes) about looking beyond the mind/belief/head space to moving into more spirit/living/heart space is probably what he wanted the discussion to be from the beginning. To the contrary, it really really really emphasizes community, relations, family, etc., So what’s the problem? It’s that the church defines which kinds of relationships are good and which are bad in a way that stifles people - e.g., defined gender roles, heteronormativity, patriarchy, etc., etc., etc., But the problem is that even here, different people have different ideas about what makes a life more fulfilling and more abundant.įor example, Phil talked in this section (around 12 minutes of part 2) about community, growing relations, etc., etc., etc., But it’s important to note that the church doesn’t disagree that community, relations, etc., are important. I don’t think any Mormon would disagree with this. Rather, I think the issue is that the church definitely has specifics, but these specifics often do not promote autonomy, a sense of self-direction, etc., I think it’s because of the one-size-fits-all approach that gets going (even if you can find quotations or ideas that suggest that maybe sometimes people can make their own choices and not fit the pattern/ideal, as it were, it’s the fact that the church absolutely preaches one sort of ideal.) Carlisle asks at some point in part 2, “I want to do better, but what does better look like?” He answers his own question: “I want them to have life, more fulfilling and abundant.” I love the recentering the discussion that we need to move away from abstractions about what eternal life/godly life entails, and I love the concept that this involves life and living…the “short list” per Carlisle - things like autonomy, personal dignity, a sense of self-direction, etc., etc., I like the idea that faith crises can be connected to these ideas, and that concerns about “beliefs” may actually be a few steps removed from more basic concerns about “short list” items.īut I don’t think the problem is that the church or people in the church or whatever fail to move away from abstractions into the specifics. Bushman, “ Faithful History,” Dialogue 4, no. Carlisle Hunsaker, “ Soul-Making, Or Is There Life Before Death?“, Dialogue 18, no. Carlisle Hunsaker, “ Mormonism and a Tragic Sense of Life,” Sunstone 41 (Sept-Oct. Please do, and then share your experiences and questions in the comments section below! What are some of the factors that lead to active “unbelief”? But what might we not see and experience should we choose that stance? What are the essential ingredients for a fully flourishing life? Could experiences in the church that leave many feeling unfulfilled in these areas be a major (albeit largely un-examined and un-spoken) factor in our choices to change our engagement or affiliation with our faith tradition? Finally, can we begin to look at faith as far more than about beliefs and attempting to find certitude, and instead as an enriched trust in God and ourselves in our deepest essence?įeaturing personal sharing, along with examinations of these and many other angles, this is a terrific conversation you will likely choose to listen to multiple times. In the course of it, they interrogate choices about believing and not believing from multiple angles. Barlow and U. Carlisle Hunsaker join Mormon Matters host Dan Wotherspoon for a fascinating and multi-layered conversation about these additional questions. For complex reasons, some of us seem to have higher tolerances for uncertainty than others, while for others of us this questioning of previously held notions quickly turns to active “disbelief” and even outright rejection of our faith tradition: “If it’s wrong on this front, it’s certainly wrong on many others.” But, are there deeper, existential-level questions we might ask that are obscured by the fact that we concentrate so much on–and make so many decisions about our faith engagement based upon–“beliefs”? What else might be underlying our current discomfort that we aren’t seeing and meeting head-on because we pose questions to ourselves mostly at the level of belief/unbelief? We’ve been confronted with evidence that challenges a truth claim or leads us to no longer unquestionably follow leaders or our current life scripts, and we naturally concentrate our attention on those claims that are now called into question. We bring our faith crises to word most often through expressions about our no longer “believing” this or that teaching.
#Divinity original sin 2 silence broken download#
275: Beyond Belief and Unbelief, Part 2 Play Now | Play in Popup | Download